A Rule Change to End No-Win Situation
If you need more evidence of why the rules for which pitcher gets the victory, look no further than last night’s Dodger game. Starter Brad Penny pitched a gem, holding San Francisco scoreless for seven innings before allowing a run in the eighth and giving way to the usually reliable Yhency Brazoban. The bullpen was due to blow a lead at some point, and last night was the first time in a long time.
Brazoban promptly gave back another run credited to Penny and one of his own to turn a 3-0 lead into a tie, and making it impossible for Penny to get a decision. Then, in the top of the ninth, the Dodgers scored three times to re-take the lead, and they held on for a 6-4 victory.
Eric Gagne got a save for getting three outs before giving up three runs (he gave up one, and faced the tying run at the plate). Brazoban, the ineffective reliever, got the win, even though he didn’t do his job of protecting a lead. And Penny got nothing except the heartfelt thanks of his teammates, who were sorely in need of a win after dropping the first two games of the series.
So let’s get this straight: Penny, who was the best Dodger pitcher of the night, got nothing while the other two guys padded their stats! Something’s wrong in Denmark.
With the number of games being decided in the late innings, baseball needs to readjust its rules so that the victory goes to the pitcher who does the best job, not the one who comes in at the most fortuitous point in the game.
Currently, a pitcher gets a win if his team takes a lead that it never relinquishes while he is in the game. That makes sense in lopsided games where the outcome is never in question. But in back and forth games or games that are tied for a long time, there are no shortage of injustices.
Let’s say Derek Lowe and Shawn Estes both pitch shutouts in tonight’s game, leaving the score tied at 0-0 in the 10th. Then both pitchers give way to relievers; Mike Koplove pitches a scoreless top half, but Giovanni Carrara gives up the winning run in the bottom half. Carrara rightly gets the loss, but does Koplove merit a victory? Hell no. He did for only one inning what Estes did nine times. But under the current rules, the win goes to Koplove.
There’s precedent for changing the rules. Currently, the starting pitcher cannot earn the victory if he does not last five innings (even if he gets hurt). In that circumstance, the official scorer decides who gets the victory, basing his choice on the pitcher who performed most effectively in relief.
I say change the rule to let the official scorer decide every win and loss. Most of the time, the choice will be easy—a starter will build a lead and his bullpen will protect it, and the scorer won’t have to make a tough decision. In last night’s game, Penny pitched most effectively, and deserved the victory. It would be foolish to argue that either of the two relievers merited a w.
There will of course be occasions where the choice is more difficult—for example, Erickson, Alvarez, and Houlton each pitch three innings and give up three runs apiece, yet the Dodgers win 10-9. But I much prefer the decision be in the hands of somebody who is paid to watch the entire game than it be decided by some arbitrary rules that don’t apply in all situations.
Brazoban promptly gave back another run credited to Penny and one of his own to turn a 3-0 lead into a tie, and making it impossible for Penny to get a decision. Then, in the top of the ninth, the Dodgers scored three times to re-take the lead, and they held on for a 6-4 victory.
Eric Gagne got a save for getting three outs before giving up three runs (he gave up one, and faced the tying run at the plate). Brazoban, the ineffective reliever, got the win, even though he didn’t do his job of protecting a lead. And Penny got nothing except the heartfelt thanks of his teammates, who were sorely in need of a win after dropping the first two games of the series.
So let’s get this straight: Penny, who was the best Dodger pitcher of the night, got nothing while the other two guys padded their stats! Something’s wrong in Denmark.
With the number of games being decided in the late innings, baseball needs to readjust its rules so that the victory goes to the pitcher who does the best job, not the one who comes in at the most fortuitous point in the game.
Currently, a pitcher gets a win if his team takes a lead that it never relinquishes while he is in the game. That makes sense in lopsided games where the outcome is never in question. But in back and forth games or games that are tied for a long time, there are no shortage of injustices.
Let’s say Derek Lowe and Shawn Estes both pitch shutouts in tonight’s game, leaving the score tied at 0-0 in the 10th. Then both pitchers give way to relievers; Mike Koplove pitches a scoreless top half, but Giovanni Carrara gives up the winning run in the bottom half. Carrara rightly gets the loss, but does Koplove merit a victory? Hell no. He did for only one inning what Estes did nine times. But under the current rules, the win goes to Koplove.
There’s precedent for changing the rules. Currently, the starting pitcher cannot earn the victory if he does not last five innings (even if he gets hurt). In that circumstance, the official scorer decides who gets the victory, basing his choice on the pitcher who performed most effectively in relief.
I say change the rule to let the official scorer decide every win and loss. Most of the time, the choice will be easy—a starter will build a lead and his bullpen will protect it, and the scorer won’t have to make a tough decision. In last night’s game, Penny pitched most effectively, and deserved the victory. It would be foolish to argue that either of the two relievers merited a w.
There will of course be occasions where the choice is more difficult—for example, Erickson, Alvarez, and Houlton each pitch three innings and give up three runs apiece, yet the Dodgers win 10-9. But I much prefer the decision be in the hands of somebody who is paid to watch the entire game than it be decided by some arbitrary rules that don’t apply in all situations.